ABSTRACT
BackgroundPsoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can greatly impact quality of life and result in substantial personal and societal costs. Complete and up to date data on the prevalence and incidence of these conditions and whether these change over time and vary by age is important for healthcare service planning so that specialist care and funding can be appropriately allocated.ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence and incidence of PsO and PsA in males and females from 2009-2019 across all age groups in England.MethodsWe used Clinical Practice Research Datalink AURUM, a primary care electronic health record database, including 20% of the English population. The codes used to identify patients with PsO and PsA were selected by rheumatologists and dermatologists and cross-checked with published code lists from other studies to ensure inclusion of all relevant codes. All included patients must have data for at least 1 year before their diagnosis. The annual incidence and point prevalence were calculated from 2009-2019 and stratified by age/sex. The study period ended in 2019 to avoid COVID-19 pandemic affecting results.ResultsThe prevalence of PsO and PsA in males and females increased annually, peaking in 2019 (PsO males 2.41% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.40, 2.42];PsO females 2.60% [95% CI 2.59-2.61];PsA males 0.20% [95% CI 0.20-0.20];PsA females 0.21% [95% CI 0.21- 0.22]), as illustrated in Table 1. In 2019, the prevalence of PsO and PsA was highest in the over 65 years age group;PsO 4.25% [95% CI 4.22-4.28] and PsA 0.38% [95% CI 0.37-0.38]. The annual incidence (per 100,000 person years) of PsO has gradually decreased in males (from 168 (164-171) in 2009 to 148 (145-151) in 2019) but in females it has been stable with a slight annual decrease (from 180 (177-184) in 2009 to 173 (170-176) in 2019). The annual incidence for PsA has increased in both males and females (13 (12-14) in 2009 and 15 (14-16) in 2019 for males and 12 (11-13) in 2009 and 18 (17-19) in 2019 for females).ConclusionThe increasing prevalence of PsO and PsA highlights the importance of organising healthcare services to meet this need, particularly in the elderly population.ReferencesNIL.Table 1.Prevalence of PsO and PsA from 2009-2019 in EnglandYear20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019Population (n)1073383110910802110318501118036711343299112249341137842211657996119336261223432512420998PsO (n)216841229106239819250667259988268032276804286499295712304568311104PsO prevalence (%, 95%CI)-Male1.98 (1.96-1.99)2.06 (2.05- 2.07)2.13 (2.12-2.14)2.19 (2.18-2.20)2.24 (2.23- 2.25)2.33 (2.32- 2.34)2.37 (2.36- 2.38)2.39 (2.38- 2.40)2.40 (2.39- 2.41)2.40 (2.39- 2.42)2.41 (2.40- 2.42)-Female2.07 (2.05- 2.08)2.14 (2.13- 2.16)2.22 (2.21- 2.23)2.29 (2.28- 2.31)2.35 (2.33- 2.36)2.45 (2.43- 2.46)2.50 (2.49- 2.51)2.53 (2.52- 2.54)2.56 (2.54- 2.57)2.58 (2.56- 2.59)2.60 (2.59- 2.61)PsO incidence (100,000 person years)-Male168 (164-171)158 (155- 162)161 (158-165)153 (150-157)161 (157- 164)156 (153- 159)155 (152- 159)154 (151- 157)153 (150-156)150 (147-153)148 (145-151)-Female180 (177-184)176 (172-179)181 (177-184)171 (167-174)175 (171-178)176 (172-180)179 (176-183)178 (174-181)177 (174-181)174 (170-177)173 (170-176)PsA (n)1444515443164681752218545196182072021994232572451425683PsA prevalence (%, 95%CI)-Male0.14 (0.14- 0.14)0.15 (0.14- 0.15)0.15 (0.15- 0.16)0.16 (0.16- 0.16)0.17 (0.16- 0.17)0.18 (0.17- 0.18)0.18 (0.18- 0.19)0.19 (0.18- 0.19)0.19 (0.19- 0.20)0.20 (0.19- 0.20)0.20 (0.20- 0.20)-Female0.13 (0.13- 0.13)0.14 (0.13- 0.14)0.15 (0.14- 0.15)0.15 (0.15- 0.16)0.16 (0.16- 0.16)0.17 (0.17- 0.18)0.18 (0.18- 0.18)0.19 (0.19- 0.19)0.20 (0.19- 0.20)0.20 (0.20- 0.21)0.21 (0.21- 0.22)PsA incidence (100,000 person years)-Male13 (12- 14)12 (11- 13)13 (12- 14)12 (11- 13)13 (12-14)14 (13- 15)14 (13- 15)14 (13-15)1514-16)14(13- 15)15 (14-16)-Female12 (11- 13)13 (12- 14)13 (12- 14)14 (13-15)14 (13-15)15 (14-16)17 (16- 18)16 (15- 17)17 (16- 18)18 (17-19)18 (17-19)Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsArani Vivekanantham: None declared, Edward Burn: None dec ared, Marta Pineda-Moncusí: None declared, Sara Khalid Grant/research support from: SK has received research grant funding from the UKRI and Alan Turing Institute outside this work. SK's research group has received grant support from Amgen and UCB Biopharma., Daniel Prieto-Alhambra Grant/research support from: DPA's department has received grant/s from Amgen, Chiesi-Taylor, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB Biopharma. His research group has received consultancy fees from Astra Zeneca and UCB Biopharma. Amgen, Astellas, Janssen, Synapse Management Partners and UCB Biopharma have funded or supported training programmes organised by DPA's department., Laura Coates Speakers bureau: LC has been paid as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., Consultant of: LC has worked as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., Grant/research support from: LC has received grants/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer.
ABSTRACT
Súhrn Úvod: Zdravotnícki pracovníci, predovšetkým sestry, môžu byť v exponovanom období počas pandémie covidu-19 vystavení zvýšenej psychickej záťaži. Cieľ: Zistiť, aký je dopad zvýšených nárokov na poskytovanie zdravotnej starostlivosti spojený s koronakrízou, na úroveň psychickej záťaže a kvality života sestier na rôznych pracoviskách. Metodika: Prierezová, prieskumná štúdia merania duševného zdravia u 504 sestier. Bol použitý štandardizovaný dotazník SF-36 a Meisterov dotazník miery neuropsychickej záťaže. Výsledky: Škála preťaženia a monotónnosti významne (p < 0,05) a negatívne (r < 0) koreluje s kvalitou života v každej z domén. Celková záťaž významne (p < 0,05) a negatívne (r < 0) koreluje s kvalitou života v každej z domén. Vek respondentov významne (p < 0,05) a pozitívne (r > 0) koreluje s kvalitou života v doménach vitalita, mentálne zdravie a duševné zdravie a negatívne (r < 0) koreluje s kvalitou života v oblastiach fyzické fungovanie, telesná bolesť, celkové vnímanie zdravia a celkové fyzické zdravie. Záťaž signifikantne lepšie zvládali muži. Signifikantne vyššia bola v skupine respondentov pracujúcich na jednotkách intenzívnej starostlivosti a v primárnej zdravotnej starostlivosti. Záver: Zvýšené nároky na poskytovanie zdravotnej starostlivosti spojené s koronakrízou negatívne pôsobili na úroveň psychickej záťaže a kvalitu života sestier. Horšie výsledky boli zaznamenané u sestier pracujúcich na jednotkách intenzívnej starostlivosti a v primárnej zdravotnej starostlivosti.Alternate :Introduction: Health care workers, especially nurses, may be exposed to increased psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To determine how the increased demands on health care delivery associated with the coronavirus crisis affect the level of psychological stress and quality of life of nurses in different workplaces. Methods: A cross-sectional exploratory study of mental health in 504 nurses. The standardized SF-36 questionnaire and Meister's questionnaire for neuropsychological strain were used. Results: The overload and monotony scales are significantly (p < 0.05) and negatively (r < 0) correlated with quality of life in each of the domains. The total load is significantly (p < 0.05) and negatively (r < 0) correlated with quality of life in each of the domains. The age of respondents is significantly (p < 0.05) and positively (r < 0) correlated with quality of life in the domains of Vitality, Mental Health, and Mental Component Summary, and negatively (r > 0) correlated with quality of life in the domains of Physical Functioning, Bodily Pain, General Health, and Physical Component Summary. Men handled the stress significantly better. Stress levels were significantly higher in the group of respondents working in intensive care units and in primary care. Conclusions: The increased demands on health care delivery associated with the coronavirus crisis had a negative impact on the level of psychological load and the quality of life of nurses. Worse results were found in nurses working in intensive care units and in primary care.
ABSTRACT
Point-of-care testing (POCT) in pediatric primary care is essential for clinicians to make a timely and accurate diagnosis. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of timely and accurate testing strategies to correctly identify the etiology of upper and lower respiratory infections. Additionally, pediatric POCT continues to be important in rural and underserved communities where access to hospital laboratories may be less available. This chapter will focus on seven rapid tests: Group A streptococcus (GAS), influenza A & B, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), C-reactive protein (CRP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe workload at rheumatology clinics have been growing relentlessly and an audit on new.referrals helps to identify referral behaviour of primary care doctors and improvement can be done by providing further training.ObjectivesTo audit on new referral cases to rheumatology clinic from 2020-2022 and to identify new cases with misdiagnosis for future training purpose.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. The medical records of all new referral to rheumatology clinic Hospital Sultan Ismail and Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah from 1st January 2020 to 31th November 2022 were reviewed. The referral diagnosis and final diagnosis were identified and analysed.ResultsThere were total of 927 new cases referral throughout the 35 months during Covid-19pandemic. Majority of them were diagnosed to have rheumatoid arthritis (217/927)followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (190/927), psoriatic arthritis (147/927),gout (62/927), osteoarthritis (58/927), systemic sclerosis (25/927), ankylosing spondylitis (25/927), soft tissue rheumatism (24/927), Sjogren syndrome (24/927),mixed connective tissue disease (14/927), vasculitis (11/927), fibromyalgia (10/927),polymyositis (7/927) and miscellaneous (39/927).45 out of the new cases were diagnosed as unlikely rheumatic diseases. There were 29pending cases awaiting final diagnosis.212 of the referrals were identified as misdiagnosis with the highest as nodal osteoarthritis.(55/212) followed by unlikely rheumatic disease (43/212), soft tissue rheumatism (24/212),psoriatic arthritis (20/212), Sjogren syndrome (14/212), gout (8/212), rheumatoid arthritis (7/212), fibromyalgia (6/212), systemic lupus erythematosus (5/212), ankylosing spondylitis (4/212), mixed connective tissue disease (3/212), systemic sclerosis (2/212), polymyositis (2/212) and others (19/212): diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, hypermobility syndrome, RS3PE syndrome, idiopathic uveitis, graft versus host disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, hypothyroidism, post streptococcal arthritis, prolapsed intervertebral disc, cerebrovascular disease, traumatic sternoclavicular joint subluxation, ledderhose disease, paraspinal muscle spasm and viral myalgia).ConclusionNodal osteoarthritis and soft tissue rheumatism can be great mimicker for inflammatory.arthritis and if wrongly diagnosed will lead to unnecessary anxiety or wrong treatment. More training is needed to improve clinical skills amongst primary care doctors.ReferencesNA.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundJanus kinase inhibitors drugs (JAKi) are novel small molecule medications known to cause abnormalities such as elevations in hepatic transaminases, decreases in neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and elevations in cholesterol and creatinine kinase. Blood monitoring is recommended and dose adjustments are advised if abnormalities arise. Recent warnings by the EMA and MHRA have highlighted the importance of monitoring these medications.Timely review and management of patients on JAKi drugs is difficult to maintain with increasing workload amongst the rheumatology team. A baseline audit (2020) demonstrated that hospital blood monitoring guidelines for JAKi drugs were not being followed. The rheumatology multidisciplinary team met and utilised Quality Improvement methodology including fish and driver diagrams to address this. This led to the creation of a pharmacist-led JAKi blood monitoring clinic.ObjectivesTo establish a pharmacist-led rheumatology blood monitoring clinic for the JAKi drug class in order to: increase patient safety with increased compliance to blood monitoring, save consultant/nurse time, improve communication with primary care on the frequency of blood testing required, increase patient understanding of the importance of blood monitoring with JAKi drugs, reinforce counselling advice such as risk of infections, shingles and thrombosis and promote medication adherence.MethodsThe clinic was established in March 2021. Patients commencing JAKi drugs are referred to the pharmacist-led clinic by the medical team. The pharmacist contacts the patient by phone following delivery of their medication. The patient is counselled on their new medication and dates for blood checks are agreed. A letter is sent to the patient and their GP providing this information. The patient is booked into virtual telephone appointments and bloods are monitored every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter. Any change or abnormality in blood results are flagged early in the patient's treatment and if necessary, discussed with the consultant. Adjustments are made to the patient's dose if appropriate.ResultsIn order to evaluate the benefit of the pharmacist clinic a re-audit of compliance with blood monitoring (March 2021- September 2022) was carried out alongside a patient satisfaction postal survey (August 2022).A total of 58 patients were sampled in the re-audit. The re-audit found an increase in compliance in blood monitoring since the introduction of the pharmacist clinic. 98% of patients had their full blood count performed at 3 months compared to 56% in audit 1 and 95% of patients had their lipid profile completed at 3 months compared to 15% in audit 1 (Table 1).A patient satisfaction survey (N=62, response rate 48%) found that 28 (93%) patients either agreed or strongly agreed that they were more aware of the importance of attending for regular blood monitoring when prescribed JAKi therapy as a result of the clinic.The pharmacy team made several significant interventions (self-graded Eadon grade 4 and 5). For example by improving medication adherence, detecting haematological abnormalities that required JAKi dose reduction, identifying patients suffering from infection requiring intervention including shingles and Covid-19.Table 1.Comparison of audit results pre (Audit 1) and post (Audit 2) clinic establishmentAudit 1 (N=48)Audit 2 (N=58)Number of patients with full blood count completed at weeks 4, 8 & 1227 (56%)57 (98%)Number of patients with lipid profile completed at week 127 (15%)55 (95%)Number of patients LFTs completed at weeks 4, 8 & 1226 (54%)54 (93%)ConclusionIntroduction of the pharmacist-led clinic has increased patient safety by ensuring compliance with blood monitoring as per hospital guidelines. The clinic has paved the way for improved communication with primary care teams and has provided patients with extra support during their first months on treatment with their JAKi. It has also expanded the role of the rheumatology pharmacy team and saved nursing and medical time.Acknowled ementsI wish to thank the SHSCT Rheumatology team for all their help, support and guidance with this project.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
Summary Objectives: To describe the characteristics of the population diagnosed with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (dm2) infected by sars-CoV-2, and to evaluate whether there is an association between dm2 history and covid-19 severity. Method(s): non-probabilistic by convenience sampling, information was obtained from the Online Notification System for Epidemiological Surveillance (sinolave) of the Family Medicine Unit No. 28 of the Mexican Institute of Social Security. A total of 1688 confirmed cases of covid-19 were identified and grouped into patients with and without dm2. Bivariate statistical analysis was performed with Excel 2019 and Stata v. 15.1 programs;measures of association were used using Poisson logistic regression and chi2 test with statistical significance <0.05. Result(s): it was observed that, in patients with covid-19 and dm2, the prevalence ratio of severe acute respiratory infection, diagnosis of pneumonia, hospitalization, and death were higher compared to the group without dm2. Conclusion(s): the frequency, of unfavorable characteristics, was higher in the group of patients with dm2. Health conditions caused by covid-19 reinforce the relevance of an intentional search for undiagnosed diabetic patients, untreated or under treatment with poor glycemic control, in order to avoid major health complications.Copyright © 2023, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Disparities exist in access to early oral health care, disproportionately impacting minority ethnic groups and populations with low socioeconomic status. Medical dental integration provides an opportunity to create a new dental access point for early prevention and intervention as well as care coordination. The Wisconsin Medical Dental Integration (WI-MDI) model expanded early access to preventive oral health services by integrating dental hygienists (DHs) into pediatric primary care and prenatal care teams to address oral health inequities with the goal of reducing dental disease. This case study will describe how DHs were incorporated into the medical care teams in Wisconsin and how legislation expanding scope of practice made this possible. Since 2019, five federally qualified health systems, one non-profit clinic, and two large health systems have enrolled in the WI-MDI project. Thirteen DHs have worked across nine clinics in the WI-MDI project and over 15,000 patient visits to a medical provider included oral health services provided by DHs from 2019 to 2023. Dental hygienists working in alternative practice models such as those demonstrated in the innovative WI-MDI approach are positioned to reduce oral health disparities through the provision of early and frequent dental prevention, intervention, and care coordination.
ABSTRACT
The objective: to provide an overview of the literature on the barriers and facilitators to physical activity (PA) promotion in primary care, as experienced by practitioners and patients. Method: A search strategy of the English-language literature was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and the COCHRANE LIBRARY. Search terms were primary care OR general practice OR family medicine OR family practitioner AND physical activity OR exercise AND barriers OR facilitators. Databases were searched from inception until 21 October 2022. Results: After screening, 63 articles were included within the summary and content analysis of this review. Analysis of the barriers to the implementation of PA highlighted four main themes perceived by practitioners: time, knowledge/skills, resources/support and financial implications. Analysis of the patient perspective identified themes which were categorised into individual (pre-existing health conditions, knowledge of benefits of PA, time/capacity), societal (social support and cultural norms) and environmental (availability of facilities and weather). Conclusions: As the importance of PA increases through the manifestation of sedentary behaviour-related disease, a combined primary care and public health approach to increase PA is required. By identifying the main barriers to PA promotion in primary care, resources and funding can be directed to address this. This is particularly relevant in the United Kingdom, with the re-negotiation of the primary care contract and the changes to healthcare delivery as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic. Throughout this review, we have explored ways of addressing the identified barriers through evidence-based interventions. © 2023 The Authors. Lifestyle Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The medical population lacks satisfactory information concerning the views regarding food perception among both male and female adult African Americans with consideration of chronic diseases, highest education level and marital status. The idea has not been fully exploited in research which has provoked the study. This study examines the views of food perception in relation to the health care and wellbeing of individuals. It offers satisfactory data that would in turn bring about the easy understanding of different perceptions concerning food choices, evaluating whether level of education and chronic disease play any role in decision making. It aims to make recommendations of the need for deploying healthier diet practices for better health outcomes. Methodology: The research is a mixed qualitative and quantitative study using both recorded interviews and a demographic questionnaire for data collection. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, the demographic questionnaire was transcribed by the investigator according to the volunteer participant's verbalized answers, who were conveniently selected on their scheduled clinic visit day. The participant read and signed the form after hands sanitized containing 70% ethyl alcohol gel. The second part of the study was a telephonic interview, which was recorded, and information transcribed onto an excel worksheet in preparation for analysis. Data was collected and tabulated in an excel worksheet and then uploaded to Statistical Packages and Software Services (SPSS) an IBM application that aided in simplifying data presentation in the form of graphs which made it easier to draw conclusions. Results: There were 65 participants with 48 females and seventeen 17 males, and 56.9% with a college education in the study of which 84.6% were responsible for buying and preparing food. From the research analysis of the collected data, it was discovered that 43.1% of participants admitted to not eating healthy, 23.1% being influenced by maintaining health, 21.5% to being influenced by taste, and 15.4% eating as their medical condition recommends. Conclusion: To promote healthier food choices we need to embrace useful education and motivation strategies to encourage healthy food perception and hence healthy eating. To minimize the risks that may emerge from unhealthy food perceptions, the recommendation is crucial for meaningful collaboration with African Americans to prioritize and implement improved dietary habits and reduce diet-related chronic diseases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
In this commentary, we report on lessons learned over 2 years (2020-2022) from conducting primary care research through a novel alliance of an ACO consisting of independent practices, a health plan, and several academic researchers, with the support of a private foundation. Am J Manag Care. 2023;29(6):In Press _____ Takeaway Points The process of collaborating on research was mutually beneficial for a network of independent practices and a group of academic researchers. * The process benefited the practices by facilitating more precise thinking about quality improvement, motivating the staff, and enabling readiness for health system change. * The process benefited the researchers by illuminating nuances of clinical and organizational workflow and revealing the practices' in-depth understanding of the communities they serve. * If practices have more federally funded opportunities to consistently participate in research, it could help speed greater adoption of payment reform models to promote health equity at the state and national levels. _____ A 2021 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report, Implementing High-Quality Primary Care, has called out the persistent "neglect of basic primary care research" in the United States.1 A 2020 study by the RAND Corporation found that primary care research represents only 1% of all federally funded projects (including projects funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], and the Veterans Health Administration).2 However, innovation in primary care is central to advancing health care delivery. Leaders in health care innovation recently called for CMS to test a proposal for primary care payment reform in accountable care organizations (ACOs) composed of independent practices (ie, practices not owned by hospitals).3 By innovating in independent practices, these leaders argued that CMS would provide incentives for those practices to stay independent, thereby potentially decreasing the vertical market consolidation that contributes to rising health care costs.3 Yet these same practices may have less experience with the kind of systematic innovation that leads to generalizable insights, because what little funding is available for primary care research is mostly awarded to large academic medical centers.1 AHRQ's practice-based research networks have not fully addressed this gap, as they have struggled to find infrastructure and maintain funding.1 In this commentary, we report on the lessons we learned over 2 years (2020-2022) from conducting primary care research through a novel alliance of an ACO consisting of independent practices, a health plan, and several academic researchers, with the support of a private foundation. [...]ACPNY found that experience with research facilitates innovation and readiness for health system change (lesson 1C).
ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients with chronic inflammatory diseases (CID) have an increased risk for contracting infections. For patients with rheumatic diseases EULAR recommends protecting them from vaccine-preventable diseases.ObjectivesTo assess the knowledge and awareness of common vaccinations and extent of immunization among patients with CID in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden (Nordics), and to identify gaps between the existing EULAR vaccination recommendations and current practice as experienced by patients.MethodsA structured anonymous online survey for patients with CID ((rheumatological disease (RD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and dermatological diseases (DD)) was conducted in 2022.The survey was answered by 1748 respondents (1031 patients with RD, 543 with IBD and 563 with DD).ResultsAmong respondents, 89% were female and 58% had disease duration of above 10 years. In total, 56% were treated in specialised and 32% in primary care. Majority had ongoing systemic immunosuppressive treatment (IT) (65%). Majority of RD (59%) and IBD (66%) patients were treated in specialised care whereas minority of DD patients (38%) were treated in specialised care.Forty-nine percent (49%) responded that their healthcare professional (HCP) did not inform them about the increased risk of infection – however, 55% of the respondents believed they are somewhat or much more likely to suffer from infections than those without CID or treatment, 33% thought there is no difference and 13% did not know there is a difference.In total 68% of respondents considered it important to get vaccinated due to CID or IT. The number was particularly high in RD group (74%), although 63% stated they had not received any information regarding vaccinations at the start of their treatment.Commonly recommended vaccinations by the HCP were COVID 19 (66%), influenza (63%) and pneumococcal (45%) vaccination. When comparing respondents ≥65 and <65 years, there was a difference in how often the influenza (71% vs. 57%) and pneumococcal (57% vs. 38%), but not COVID 19 vaccination (68% vs. 65%), were recommended. In addition, 74% and 75% of respondents receiving IT were recommended influenza and COVID 19 vaccination, respectively.In total, 22% had their vaccination status checked before initiating treatment;the lowest percentage was in DD (16%) and the highest in RD (25%). However, 44% of respondents received influenza vaccination before initiation of treatment. Moreover, 62% and 74% of respondents received influenza and COVID 19 vaccination while on treatment, respectively.Eighty-six percent (86%) did not receive a vaccination plan in relation to their CID and treatment. Moreover, 64% of the respondents (RD 57%;DD 71% and IBD 66%) did not have vaccination status assessed on a regular basis. Forty-three percent (43%) were dissatisfied with the follow-up of vaccination status by their HCP. Respondents of age ≥65 years were more satisfied than the younger ones (34% vs. 25% very satisfied) and respondents with RD were more satisfied than those with IBD or DD (33% vs. 25% vs. 20%).Forty-four percent (44%) responded that the information on vaccinations related to their CID and treatment was difficult to find and 71% would like to receive more information.The respondents with RD had different level of awareness regarding EULAR vaccination recommendations. The degree of awareness among patients with RD treated with IT are presented in Figure 1.ConclusionThis Nordic survey provides insights on patients' information needs, information sources and own experiences related to recommendations on vaccinations in relation to their CID and IT. The results confirm a gap between patients' expectations and needs vs. the information they actually receive. Our findings demonstrate a need for increased awareness among patients, providers and HCP regarding EULAR vaccination recommendations in patients with RD.Reference[1]Furer V, et al. 2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79: 9–52.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsMeliha C Kapetanovic Grant/research support from: Received independent research grants from Roche and Pfizer, Randeep Mandla Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Norway, Maria Seddighzadeh Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Sweden, Susanne Thiesen Gren Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Denmark, Maaria Palmroth Consultant of: Employee of MedEngine Oy and contractor for Pfizer Oy, Employee of: Contractor for Pfizer Oy, Finland, Dan Henrohn Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer AB, Sweden, Anne Grete Frostrup Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Denmark, Anna-Maria Hiltunen Consultant of: Pfizer. Employee of Nordic Healthcare Group, Jussi Ranta Consultant of: Pfizer. Employee of Nordic Healthcare Group, Anna-Kaisa Asikainen Consultant of: Pfizer. Employee of Nordic Healthcare Group, Veli-Jukka Anttila Speakers bureau: Lectures for Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Roche, GSK, BMS, Biogen, Sandoz, Gilead, Unimedic Pharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Astra-Zeneca, Consultant of: Consultant for Pfizer and MSD.
ABSTRACT
Psychosocial issues are cen-'tral to the care of adolescent patients. Pediatricians routinely discuss substance use, sexual health, and accident prevention with adolescents and are likely to see specific mental health concerns in about 20% of their patients. In light of rising suicide rates and the likely consequences of COVID-19, depression is an increasingly common concern. With limited access to mental health clinicians, individual pediatricians must manage patients' mental health needs by enhancing their own skills, collocating mental health personnel in their practices, and building trusted referral networks. Because psychosocial screening is now an expected part of pediatric primary care,1 this article focuses on screening adolescent patients, including choice of tools and follow-up of positive results.
ABSTRACT
IDDF-2023-ABS-0156 Table 1Association between Tolerance of BP for index colonoscopy and surveillance rateTolerance of BP for index colonoscopy Surveillance rate% (n/N) Total 67% (127/186) 1. Very intolerable 47% (9/19) 2. Intolerable 48% (10/21) 3. Neither tolerable nor intolerable 76% (55/72) 4. Tolerable 71% (22/31) 5. Very tolerable 72% (31/43) P for trend test 0.04 IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Table 2Risk factors of non-compliance of surveillance colonoscopy by multivariate regression analysis Multivariate OR (95%CI) p value Age,/1-year increase 1.04 (1.03-1.05) 0.001 Male sex 1.13 (0.85-1.52) 0.40 BMI,/1-kg/m2 increase 1.05 (0.96-1.15) 0.28 Family history of CRC 0.93 (0.16-5.25) 0.92 Low education 0.92 (0.39-2.15) 0.90 Comorbidities 1.05 (0.51-2.13) 0.90 Low tolerance of BP for colonoscopy 2.45 (1.11-5.41) 0.006 Absence of primary care physician 4.63 (1.60-13.4) 0.001 BMI: body mass index, CRC: colorectal cancer, BP: bowel preparation IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Table 3The reasons of non-compliance surveillance colonoscopyReasons of non-compliance surveillance colonoscopy n, (%) Total 62 (100%) Not knowing about follow-up intervals 4 (6%) Having no symptoms 15 (24%) Fear of examination Pain during colonoscopy 1 (2%) Embarrassment during colonoscopy 0 (0%) Bowel preparation for colonoscopy 17 (28%) Over sedation during colonoscopy 2 (3%) Old age/severe illness for surveillance 10 (16%) Having no time 10 (16%) Having no money 1 (2%) Fear of Covid-19 infection 2 (3%) IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Figure 1ConclusionsOur findings highlight the need for improvement of the surveillance colonoscopy rate, especially for patients who had poor tolerance to BP on index colonoscopy and no gastroenterology visit. Providing a well-tolerated BP regimen may lead to an increase in surveillance colonoscopy compliance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One-third of pregnant women will experience worsening asthma requiring emergency hospitalization. However, no report comprehensively discussed the management of asthma attacks in pregnant women in impoverished settings. We attempt to illuminate what general practitioners can do to stabilize and improve the outcome of severe acute asthma exacerbations in primary care with resource limitations. CASE REPORT: A nulliparous 29-year-old woman in her 21st week of pregnancy presented severe acute asthma exacerbation in moderate persistent asthma with uncontrolled asthma status along with gestational hypertension, uncompensated metabolic acidosis with a high anion gap, anemia, respiratory infection, and asymptomatic bacteriuria, all of which influenced her exacerbations. This patient was admitted to our resource-limited subdistrict hospital in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic for optimal stabilization. Crystalloid infusions, oxygen supplementation, nebulized beta-agonist with anticholinergic agents, inhaled corticosteroids, intravenous methylprednisolone, broad-spectrum antibiotics, subcutaneous terbutaline, mucolytics, magnesium sulphate, oral antihypertensives, and continuous positive airway pressure were used to treat her life-threatening asthma. After she was stabilized, we referred the patient to a higher-level hospital with more advanced pulmonary management under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team to anticipate the worst scenario of pregnancy termination. CONCLUSION(S): Limitations in primary care, including the lack of sophisticated intensive care units and laboratory panels, may complicate challenges in managing severe acute asthma exacerbation during pregnancy. To enhance maternal-fetal outcomes, all multidisciplinary team members should be well-informed about key asthma management strategies during pregnancy using evidence-based guidelines regarding the drug, rationale, and safety profile.Copyright © 2023 Muhammad Habiburrahman, Triya Damayanti, Mohammad Adya Firmansha Dilmy, Hariyono Winarto.
ABSTRACT
Am J Manag Care. 2023;29(6):In Press _____ Takeaway Points The value of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine services offered by academic health systems is understudied. * DTC telemedicine services for low-acuity or minor illnesses are increasingly offered as an employee benefit, but any per-episode unit cost advantage may be offset by overuse of care. * DTC telemedicine staffed by an academic health system and offered to its employees resulted in lower per-episode unit costs for care within 7 days and only marginally increased the use of services. * DTC telemedicine staffed by an academic health system and offered directly to employees was cost-saving. _____ Employers in the United States have increasingly been offering a direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine benefit for low-acuity or minor illnesses to their employees.1-3 By 2021, more than 95% of employers with 50 or more employees provided some coverage for DTC telemedicine in their largest health plan;more than 75% felt that offering telemedicine was important and nearly 20% either limited or eliminated cost sharing for telemedicine.4 Despite these trends among general employers, few health systems have directly provided DTC telemedicine to their own employees. [...]because these services are easy to access (often available immediately, around the clock, and without travel), they may induce overuse of care, especially for self-limited conditions such as viral upper respiratory infections for which the alternative to in-person care is no care at all, thus increasing the overall cost of care.5-11 Telemedicine will save money relative to in-person care if any unit price advantages are not overwhelmed by the increased use of care overall, induced by its convenience. Employers provide health insurance coverage for 158 million Americans or nearly 50% of the population. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, telemedicine has represented a significantly larger portion of all medical claims—consistently more than 5% of all medical claims by mid-202112-15—and the estimated value of the global telemedicine industry is projected to reach a quarter of a trillion dollars by 2024.13 Yet, the future of telemedicine remains undetermined with reimbursement rates in debate,16-18 driven in large part because its economic value is understudied and uncertain. Penn Medicine is self-insured and more than 95% of employees use its only employer-sponsored plan—a preferred provider organization (PPO) plan—rather than insurance obtained individually or through a family member. Since 2017, these PPO-insured employees have been offered Penn Medicine OnDemand,19 a 24/7 DTC telemedicine benefit to employees and their adult (≥ 18 years) dependents.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundDelay in the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis may be associated with poorer outcome. However, the effectiveness of strategies to enable early detection of psoriatic arthritis in a primary care population with psoriasis have not been investigated in a prospective randomised control trial.ObjectivesThe primary objective was to determine whether early detection of undiagnosed PsA in people with psoriasis by an enhanced surveillance (ES) intervention compared to standard care (SC) improves outcome in physical function at 24 months post-registration. Secondary objectives were to compare disease activity and impact of disease between groups in those participants diagnosed with PsA.MethodsA multi-centre, prospective, parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial in patients with psoriasis with no prior diagnosis of PsA was conducted. GP practices were randomised in a 1:1 allocation ratio with stratification for GP practice list size and Central Commissioning Group (CCG). A total of 133 GP practices and 2226 participants were required to achieve a target sample size for the primary analysis population of 148 participants (74 per group) with a positive diagnosis of PsA;the latter corresponding to 80% power for detecting the MCID in the primary outcome measure of 0.35 units. Participants recruited were managed according to either SC, or ES by annual rheumatological assessment. Participants with suspected inflammatory arthritis were referred, via their GP, to the local rheumatology outpatient clinic at participating hospitals for an assessment of PsA by the ‘treating rheumatologist' (ES arm: at baseline, 12 and 24 months;SC arm: at 24 months). Participants diagnosed with PsA then entered the PsA-care pathway element of the trial. The primary outcome measure was the HAQ_DI at 24 months post registration in participants diagnosed with PsA. Secondary outcome measures, PASDAS and PsAID-12, were assessed over time in participants with a positive diagnosis of PsA.ResultsA total of 2225 participants across 135 GP practices were registered, corresponding to 1123 allocated to ES and 1102 to SC;primary analysis population consisted of 87 participants with a positive diagnosis of PsA: 64 in ES, 23 in SC (Figure one). Baseline characteristics were similar across both treatment groups. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for achieving a HAQ-DI score of 0 at 24 months post registration in ES compared to SC was 0.64 (95% CI (0.17, 2.38)), indicating no evidence of a difference between treatment groups (p=0.5075). Moreover, the adjusted OR of achieving a higher (non-zero) HAQ-DI score at 24 months post registration in ES relative to SC arm was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.86), again indicating no evidence of a difference between the two treatment groups (p=0.6612). There was high variability on the impact of the disease between participants over time, although the impact is generally low in this group of participants with an ‘early' diagnosis of PsA. Moreover, the overall PASDAS score and component scores over time post PsA diagnosis show high variability in PsA disease activity. No adverse events were reported.ConclusionThere was insufficient evidence that early diagnosis by ES and subsequent treatment improves physical function compared to SC in patients with psoriasis. Limitations included the trial being underpowered for demonstrating the pre-specified treatment effect;only 6.2% of participants recruited had a positive diagnosis of PsA, much lower than assumed (18%). The imbalance observed between treatment groups (~ 3:1 ratio (ES:SC)), is largely explained by the lower proportion of participants especially in the SC arm attending the screening visit at 24 months, and delays between referral and attending appointment with the treating clinician, all further exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic. Furthermore, a longer duration of follow-up may be necessary to detect differences in outcome and is planned.ReferencesNil.Figure 1.AcknowledgementsThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)Programme rants for Applied Research programme.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
In 2018, CAI, an organization that provides national level training and capacity-building developed a TIC implementation model, now delivered in HIV and primary care agencies throughout the United States to integrate TIC into their culture, environment, and service delivery. In 2018, an organization that provides national level training and capacity-building, Cicatelli Associates, Inc. (CAI), developed a TIC implementation model, now delivered in HIV and primary care agencies throughout the United States to integrate TIC into their culture, environment, and service delivery. PWH who have experienced trauma are 58% less likely to adhere to their antiretroviral treatment compared to PHW who have not experienced trauma (Brown. Since 2018, CAI, a national training and technical assistance organization, has developed and implemented a TIC implementation model to build the capacity of primary care agencies and their healthcare staff to integrate TIC throughout their cultures, environments, and service delivery. The motivation for this model is based on the understanding that primary care providers play a critical role in identifying and addressing past trauma with clients, as opposed to simply relying on referrals to external mental health services to support these needs. CAI technical assistance providers offer capacity building and training to staff at these agencies to implement components of the model to ensure successful integration of TIC into agency culture, environment, and service delivery.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundInflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juveneille inflammatory arthritsi (JIA), are common and cause a high disease burden globally. Early diagnosis of iRMDs and subsequent timely access to disease modifying therapies is associated with improved health and socio-economic outcomes. However, the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the way healthcare was delivered changed abruptly as all consultations were ‘remote by default' was widely implemented, replacing traditional ‘face-to-face' healthcare.ObjectivesTo describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon referral patterns and incident diagnosis of iRMDs.MethodsData from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum were analysed from 01/04/17 to 01/10/2021 to describe episodes of care for patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, in a primary care setting, for pre-COVID-19 (01/04/2017–31/03/2020), early-COVID-19 (01/04/2020–31/07/2021), and late-COVID-19 pandemic (01/08/2020–31/10/2021) periods. Prevalent and incident MSK consultations were determined. Referrals were matched to these consultations. Trends in referrals to MSK services and further incident diagnoses of iRMDs were described using Joinpoint regression and comparisons made between time-periods. Negative binomial regression was used to compare incident rates between time-periods: first MSK consultation to RA/JIA/iRMD diagnosis;first MSK consultation to first referral;first referral to RA/JIA/iRMD diagnosis. The number of consultations between first MSK consultation and referral/diagnosis were described. Results were adjusted for age and sex and further stratified by geographical region and deprivation.ResultsThe incidence of RA and JIA reduced by -13.3% (from 32.0 to 17.2 per 100,000) and -17.4% (from 1.8 to 0.97 per 1,000,000) per month respectively between January 2020 and April 2020, and then increased by 1.9% (from 17.2 to 25.2 per 100,000) and 3.7% (from 0.97 to 1.3 per 1,000,000) per month respectively between April 2020 and October 2021. The incidence of all diagnosed iRMDs was stable until October 2021. Referral incidence decreased between February 2020 and May 2020 by -16.8% (from 4.8 to 2.4 per 100) per month in patients presenting with a MSK condition. After May 2020, referrals increased significantly (16.8% per month from 2.4 to 4.5 per 100) to July 2020. Time from first MSK consultation to RA diagnosis, and referral to RA diagnosis increased in the early-pandemic period (rate ratio (RR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.15;RR 1.23, 95%CI 1.17-1.30) and remained consistently higher in the late-pandemic (RR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.16;RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.23-1.32) periods respectively, compared to the pre-COVID-19 period.ConclusionPatients with underlying RA/JIA that developed during the pandemic may be yet to present, or in the process of being referred and/or diagnosed. Primary care clinicians should remain alert to this possibility and consider the use of fast-track referral pathways where indicated. It is apparent that patients developing incident episodes of inflammatory arthropathies may display a prodrome of other MSK symptoms and conditions, which alone may not warrant referral but in combination require further investigation. Commissioners should be alert to these findings to allow for the appropriate planning and commissioning of services.References[1]Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, et al. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010;11:144.[2]NHS England and NHS Improvement. Important and urgent - Next steps on NHS response to COVID-19 2020. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/C0098-total-triage-blueprint-september-2020-v3.pdf Accessed Oct 2, 2021.AcknowledgementsWe wish to acknowledge: members of our PPIE group who helped to formulate the research question and provide insight into the implications of our results;and to Prof Edward Roddy, Prof Sa antha Hider and Dr Lorna Clarson for their insights as consultant rheumatologists and commissioners of healthcare services.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
Este artigo focaliza a atuação de assistentes sociais na atenção primária em saúde (APS), na pandemia do Covid-19. Discute a crise sanitária, problematizando a ofensiva ultraneoliberal e suas implicações na atenção primária em saúde cuja potencialidade assistencial foi esvaziada por meio de várias medidas tomadas pelo Governo Federal, como mudanças na Política Nacional de Atenção Básica e o Previne Brasil. Foi realizada pesquisa nos Anais do IX Congresso Nacional de Serviço Social em Saúde, destacando trabalhos sobre APS. Foi desenvolvida análise com base no materialismo-histórico-dialético, considerando a historicidade, mediações e contradições. Foram identificados desafios à atuação profissional, como o uso de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação (TIC), o teletrabalho, a precarização da política de saúde. Entre as estratégias de ação utilizadas destacam-se: ações educativas, articulação com a rede socioassistencial, entre outras. Considera-se que a negação de direitos como método governamental distancia o horizonte emancipatório do projeto ético-político da profissão.Alternate :The article focuses on the role of social workers in primary health care (PHC) during the covid-19 pandemic. It discusses the health crisis, questioning the ultra-neoliberal offensive and its implications for primary health care, which its care potential has been emptied, through various measures taken by the Federal Government, such as changes in the National Primary Care Policy and Previne Brasil. Research was carried out in the Annals of the IX National Congress of Social Service in Health, highlighting works on PHC. An analysis was developed based on dialectical-historical-materialism, considering historicity, mediations and contradictions. Challenges to professional performance were identified, such as the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), teleworking, and the precariousness of health policy. Among the action strategies used, the following stand out: educational actions, articulation with the social assistance network, among others. It is considered that the denial of rights as a governmental method distances the emancipatory horizon from the ethical-political project of the profession.